This week was relatively short in terms
of class time and field work, in fact we only went out to the field in one
occasion. On Monday we had a short review of fluvial deposits and an
introduction to deep-water deposits. We also discussed the similarities and
differences between river, turbidite, debris flows, and hyperpycnal flow channels
since they may look somewhat similar in map view but in detail they could be
quite different. This reflects the differences in depositional environments and
sediment sources.
|
View of Honaskogdalen, most of the lower areas are covered by
moss or grass since the snow has melted but in some higher areas there are
still patches of snow.
|
|
Walking on rock fall and debris flows on the slopes of Honaskogdalen.
|
During our only day out in the field we
visited Honaskogdalen, a fjord valley located about 7 km north of Longyearbyen.
The walk to the outcrop area was long; it took us over an hour of walking to
reach the outcrops we were studying. I was surprised to see that there was
still snow in some of the channels and ravines, since it is July, but evidently
much less snow than there was during our first day out in the field. Again we
were divided into groups and given a certain area to map and create a
stratigraphic column, and then we had to correlate our columns to interpret the
depositional environment. The formation of interest is called Helvetiafjellet
from the lower Cretaceous and consists of fluvial, deltaic, and tidal deposits
representing an overall transgressive pattern. We were advised by our
instructor to take pictures of the whole area and pinpoint in our drawings
where we did the stratigraphic columns because correlating could be difficult
after leaving the study area. The next day we realized she was right.
Wednesday was a short seminar day. The
main goal for the day was to correlate all the stratigraphic columns and
discuss our observations in the field.
The groups found coal seams, mud drapes, thick massive sandstone bodies,
ripples, and dunes as well as parallel bedding. All of these agree with the
environment of deposition expected but our main problem was agreeing on the
correlation of our columns. Something we agreed on was the presence of several
channels, which may explain why the deposits are different even if they are
close to one another. Thursday was “reading day”, which we used to study for
our final (comprehensive) exam on Friday.
|
Students at Sukkertoppen hill next to Longyearbyen, for a last hike together(me in the red
jacket and jeans). |
|
View from Sukkertoppen hill. Student dorms and Longyear glacier.
|
|
View of Longyearbyen from Sukkertoppen hill, UNIS is the marroon
building in the center. Notice the brown sediment plumes coming from rivers
draining glaciers and going into the blue fjord water.
|
|
Longyearbyen street, going from the sea towards Longyear
glacier (on the background).
|
And just like any other class, this one
also came to an end. I believe it was very rewarding, both academically and
personally. I have gained perspective and experience on glaciated environments,
which will be very useful since I live in the sub-tropics. Above all, the
professors and fellow classmates were especially amazing and I am so grateful to
have met them.
No comments:
Post a Comment